Target date funds (TDFs) are everywhere, from 401(k)s to IRAs, and they are quickly becoming the most common default investment in 401(k) plans. They allow you to pick the fund with the year closest to when you expect to retire, make regular systematic contributions, and let professionals handle the rest. But simplicity can hide important trade-offs. Depending on your goals, risk tolerance, and tax situation, a target date fund may be the perfect fit, or an imperfect default. This article explains how TDFs work, when they shine, where they fall short, and how to evaluate whether one belongs in your retirement plan.
In general, a target date fund is a single, diversified investment that automatically adjusts its mix of stocks, bonds, and other assets over time. The “target date” (e.g., 2050) is the year you expect to retire. In the early years, the fund holds more equities for growth. As you approach the target date, it gradually reduces equity exposure and increases fixed income assets such as bonds and cash to dampen volatility and support withdrawals. This gradual change in risk is referred to as the glide path.
There are two main approaches to glide paths. Some funds are designed to manage risk “to” retirement, meaning they reach their most conservative allocation at the target year and then remain there. Others are designed to manage risk “through” retirement, continuing to reduce equity exposure for several years after the retirement date, assuming you will hold the fund well into retirement. Neither approach is inherently better; the right one depends on your needs and assumptions about longevity, income, and risk tolerance.
Most TDFs are “funds of funds”. Your single fund actually owns several underlying indices or active funds, such as U.S. stocks, international stocks, bonds, inflation bonds, and more. The fund is then actively managed by an investment team that sets the glide path, rebalances the portfolio of funds automatically, and implements active, passive, or blended investment techniques. Because each provider makes different choices, two target date 2050 funds can behave very differently.
Target date funds are a basic way to invest with simplicity that reduces behavioral mistakes. Many investors procrastinate, chase performance, or don’t have the time to actively manage and rebalance their portfolios. A TDF systematizes all of that, which can help you stay invested through market swings and avoid making emotionally-based financial decisions. They allow you to be diversified in different areas of the market without having to piece together several different funds yourself. Having the TDF actively managed provides for a level of professional oversight over your investment, opening the door for research, risk controls, and a documented process that guides allocations rather than your gut feeling. For individuals who don’t want to manage their portfolio, TDFs often serve as an appropriate alternative to other options in the investment universe.
While target date funds might sound like a no-brainer at this point, there are many factors that create a significant case against TDFs. You may have heard of the term “one-size-fits-all”. You can think of target date funds as “one-size-fits-too-many”. Glide paths target an “average” investor, but your circumstances may be far from average. Large pensions, rental income, business ownership, concentrated employer stock, or plans to retire early can require a very different risk profile than what the standard glide path of a TDF provides.
Another limitation is the significant variation between fund providers. Two 2040 funds may look identical by name but hold allocations that differ by 20 percentage points in equities at retirement. That gap can lead to dramatically different levels of volatility and portfolio outcomes at a time when losses can be especially damaging.
One of the biggest downsides of target date funds is the hidden underlying fees. While many TDFs are inexpensive compared to other investments such as mutual funds, some carry higher expense ratios due to actively managed components. Hidden within them is the fee to manage the target date fund as well as the fees of the underlying fund. Over decades, those extra costs can meaningfully erode your returns without you necessarily noticing it.
In addition, target date funds tend to be tax-inefficient when held in taxable brokerage accounts. Because they regularly rebalance and include income-producing allocations, they generate taxable events that might otherwise be managed more strategically across different account types. Rebalancing also becomes less efficient when everything is confined to a single target date fund. Investors who hold multiple asset classes separately have the opportunity to rebalance across accounts and asset types in a more efficient manner. For example, an advisor can strategically sell equities in one account and buy bonds in another, minimizing taxes while keeping your overall allocation intact. That kind of coordination is not possible when everything is locked inside a single TDF, which means investors lose flexibility and may sacrifice some long-term efficiency.
Finally, mixing a TDF with other funds undermines its design. Many investors are tempted to add an equity index fund of their choosing for “extra growth,” but doing so makes the portfolio riskier than intended and disrupts the carefully calibrated glide path.
If you have made it this far and are considering a TDF, there are several key questions to ask. Start with the glide path. What percentage of equities will the fund hold as you approach retirement, and does that align with your comfort level with risk? Pay attention to whether the fund is a “to” or “through” design and match that with whether you intend to stay in the fund during retirement.
Next, look at the underlying holdings. Are they passive or active? Do they include a broad enough set of asset classes to provide global diversification across several areas of the market and include a way to hedge against inflation? Most importantly, review the expense ratio and favor cost-efficient options, since fees are one of the few factors you can control. Finally, review the fund’s philosophy. A strong track record of adhering to a disciplined strategy is more important than recent performance alone.
Target date funds are often an excellent choice for early-career savers or those who prefer simplicity. When your account balances are smaller, your contribution rate has a far greater impact on your future wealth than fine-tuning asset allocation. In this stage, having a diversified, automatically managed portfolio allows you to focus on building the habit of saving. Because the funds rebalance internally, pairing them with a tax-advantaged account like a 401(k) shields them from tax consequences as they grow over time. For investors who do not have the time or desire to manage a portfolio, TDFs provide some professional oversight at a relatively low cost and are generally far superior to staying in cash.
As your financial situation becomes more complex, you might outgrow the one-size-fits-all approach of a TDF. Investors nearing retirement often have specific income needs that don’t align with the glide path of a target date fund. Those with significant outside assets, such as a pension, rental property, or employer stock, may also find that a TDF’s asset allocation doesn’t match their risk tolerance. In these cases, a more personalized approach can provide better diversification and tax outcomes.
Target date funds represent one of the most useful innovations in retirement investing. For many savers, they offer an easy, disciplined way to stay invested, diversified, and on track toward retirement. But ease does not always equal optimal. As retirement nears or your financial situation grows more complex, a generic TDF may not reflect your actual needs, income sources, or tax circumstances. Transitioning from target date funds to individual asset class holdings can allow you to avoid the hidden management fees on top of the fees of the underlying funds. Ongoing investment management with opportunistic rebalancing provides additional opportunities to take advantage of relative changes within asset classes that may further enhance returns. In either case, making an informed, intentional decision is key to ensuring that your retirement investments reflect not only the year on the fund’s label, but also the unique story of your life and goals.
Tags:
Reach out today. This could be the start of a great relationship.
Contact Us
